The Good Thread

My boss and I met with some potential clients today, and I guess they wanted to impress us just as much, if not more, than we wanted to impress them. So we met for lunch at the Ingomar Club, née the Carson Mansion. I only really got to see a small part of it on the inside, but damned if it wasn’t swanky - I felt pretty out of place and insufficiently dressed in my standard “business casual” work garb.
But the meeting went pretty well. We may have just snagged ourselves another good-sized web job.
Albright:
Pepsi to release “Throwback” sodas later this year (for a limited time) made with real sugar instead of high fructose corn syrup. Sweet. (Pun intended.) I wonder if I’ll really be able to taste the difference, though…
I’ve never tried it myself (and I don’t drink soda anymore, anyway), but those that have claim that soda sweetened with cane sugar is much tastier than soda sweetened with HFCS.
Gun fight with the feds in Big Sky Country?
The proposed law aims to exempt firearms, weapons components and ammunition made in Montana and kept in Montana from federal gun laws. Since the state has few gun laws of its own, the legislation would allow some gunowners and sellers in the state to skirt registration, licensing requirements and background checks entirely.
…
House Bill 246 sailed through the Montana Legislature, but Democratic Gov. Brian Schweitzer has not yet offered a position on the measure, which awaits his action.
The federal enforcement agency for gun laws has also not taken a firm stand.
I hope their Gov signs it - he just might, from what I hear - I’d love to sit back and watch that fight.
Whatever the outcome, the people of Montana should soon gain some insight into whether their governor’s true loyalty lies with them and the Constitution, or with his party and president.
If he does sign it, we’ll get to see the same thing about a whole lot of people in DC, the Media, etc…
I’ve been doing weight watchers for a while, and it’s successful and easy to follow for the most part. I can also eat whatever the hell I want and still lose weight - as long as I don’t eat too much of it.
Er, as far as the water thing, that’s been debunked as a myth. There was an actual study done on it: Drinking more water just makes you have to pee more often. It doesn’t “flush” anything out of your system that wasn’t going to be flushed already. And any drink will do, there’s no reason it has to be water; basically your body knows what it needs and when you need to drink, you’ll get thirsty. I’d suspected this before seeing the study, because when I drink extra water it just makes my pee less yellow.
Also, my nose runs quite often because I have allergies. Yeah, my body is overactive and trying to rid itself of fucking mold or something. Don’t see how that applies to a diet book, but whatever.
If there’s a self-righteous chapter about the evils of the devil meat, then I’m glad I never bought the skinny bitch book.
Albright, I just thought I’d reiterate that Weight Watchers really does work. I don’t go to meetings, either, I just do it online. If you’re looking to lose weight I highly recommend it. It’s easy to follow and it does retrain you in how to eat. It’s also easier to keep track of 20-30 points than it is keep track of 1,500 - 2,000 calories.
My parents and I went on a trip to the San Diego County Fair for the day. We walked around the place, rode the skylift, checked out the market booths and attractions, had lunch… Typical fair stuff.
The highlight of the trip, though, was when one booth was selling Song of the South on DVD. I bought a copy, and now I’m going to watch it later tonight.
So how did you like SOTS, Daikun? I haven’t seen that since I was a little, little kid (back in the stone-age, you know). Didn’t you know that film is racist, and must not be viewed by anyone anywhere for any reason? Of course, compared to the pc crap Disney cranks out these days it just might seem very good in spite of its racist overtones.
GrinfilledCelt:
So how did you like SOTS, Daikun? I haven’t seen that since I was a little, little kid (back in the stone-age, you know). Didn’t you know that film is racist, and must not be viewed by anyone anywhere for any reason? Of course, compared to the pc crap Disney cranks out these days it just might seem very good in spite of its racist overtones.
It’s actually a pretty good movie. I was surprised at how little animation there was in the film, though. There’s only about 27 minutes’ worth of animation in the whole film.
Yes, I knew that the film had racist overtones, but it’s such a rare film that I had to pick it up. Surprisingly, though, the white people get worse treatment in the film than the black people. The only worst that happens to two black characters in the movie is angry verbal abuse from a couple of bratty kids and a mother calmly telling Uncle Remus to leave her son alone. That’s it.
There are no slaves in the film. It takes place AFTER the Civil War, when slavery was outlawed.
There’s actually a lot of exaggerated spin on this film. Check out the user comments on its IMDB page (not just the one I linked to, but also the ones under it) to see a dissection of the myths circulated about this movie.




